← Home

Testing Framework for New Coding Models

Structured approach to evaluate LLMs across multiple dimensions with practical benchmarks
GenAI Community
join.maxpool.dev �
Core Testing Dimensions
Key metrics and quality attributes for comprehensive evaluation
Category Metric Description
Performance Metrics Speed/Latency Time to first token and total completion time
Accuracy Correctness of code output and bug detection rate
Task Completion Rate Percentage of tasks completed successfully without human intervention
Cost Efficiency Token usage and API costs per task type
Quality Attributes Determinism/Repeatability Consistency of outputs for identical prompts
Verbosity Control Ability to adjust response length and detail level
Steerability How well the model follows specific instructions and constraints
Context Management Handling of large codebases and long conversation threads
Operational Characteristics Number of Attempts Iterations needed for complex tasks
Error Recovery Ability to self-correct and handle edge cases
Multi-file Reasoning Coordination across multiple files and dependencies
Tool Integration Effectiveness with CLI tools, IDEs, and version control
Use Case Categories with Example Queries
Practical test scenarios across different development workflows

2.1 Brainstorming & Architecture Design

Test Focus: Creativity, system design understanding, trade-off analysis
1. "Design a scalable architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor supporting 10,000 concurrent users"
2. "Suggest 5 different approaches to implement a recommendation engine for an e-commerce platform, with pros and cons"
3. "What design patterns would work best for a plugin system in a desktop application?"
4. "Brainstorm solutions for reducing cold start latency in a serverless architecture"

2.2 Proof of Concept (PoC) Development

Test Focus: Speed of implementation, working prototypes, minimal viable code
1. "Create a PoC for a webhook dispatcher system with retry logic and exponential backoff"
2. "Build a minimal GraphQL server with authentication and rate limiting"
3. "Implement a basic version control system in Python that supports commit, diff, and merge"
4. "Create a prototype web scraper that handles JavaScript-rendered pages and respects robots.txt"

2.3 Production Codebase - Feature Addition

Test Focus: Understanding existing patterns, maintaining consistency, integration complexity
1. "Add a bulk export feature to this Django REST API [attach codebase], maintaining existing authentication and pagination patterns"
2. "Implement soft delete functionality across all models in this Rails application [attach schema]"
3. "Add WebSocket support to this Express server for real-time notifications, integrating with the existing event system"
4. "Create a new admin dashboard component in this React app that follows the existing component structure and design system"

2.4 Production Codebase - Bug Fixes

Test Focus: Root cause analysis, edge case detection, minimal change fixes
1. "Users report that the search feature returns duplicate results after pagination. Debug and fix this issue [attach relevant code]"
2. "The application crashes when processing files larger than 100MB. Find and fix the memory leak"
3. "Fix the race condition in this concurrent data processing pipeline [attach code]"
4. "Database connections are not being properly released in error scenarios. Identify and fix all connection leak points"

2.5 Agentic Applications

Test Focus: Long-running tasks, multi-step reasoning, autonomous decision-making
1. "Analyze this entire codebase and generate a comprehensive technical documentation with API references"
2. "Create a migration plan to upgrade this Node.js application from v14 to v20, handling all breaking changes"
3. "Build an automated code review agent that checks for security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations"
4. "Develop a test generator that creates comprehensive unit tests for all public methods in this Java project"

2.6 Code Analysis & Summarization

Test Focus: Comprehension accuracy, relevant detail extraction, clarity of explanation
1. "Analyze this pull request and summarize the changes, potential impacts, and any risks"
2. "Create an onboarding guide for new developers based on this codebase structure"
3. "Generate a dependency analysis report showing which packages can be safely updated"
4. "Summarize the authentication flow in this application for a security audit"
Testing Methodology
Systematic approach to model evaluation and comparison

Baseline Establishment

  • Run identical queries across multiple models (GPT-5 Codex, Claude Opus 4.1, Claude Sonnet 4.5)
  • Document completion times, token usage, and success rates
  • Create a scoring rubric for subjective qualities

Progressive Complexity Testing

  • Level 1: Simple, single-file tasks (5-50 lines)
  • Level 2: Multi-file coordination (100-500 lines)
  • Level 3: Large codebase navigation (1000+ lines)
  • Level 4: Complex architectural changes

Stress Testing Scenarios

  • Maximum context window utilization
  • Highly ambiguous requirements
  • Contradictory constraints
  • Legacy code with poor documentation
  • Multi-language polyglot projects
Metric Measurement Method Target Threshold
Speed Time to completion < 2 minutes for simple tasks
Accuracy Unit test pass rate > 95% for generated code
Determinism Variance across 10 runs < 10% output variation
Verbosity Lines of explanation vs code Adjustable 1:1 to 1:5 ratio
Cost $ per 1000 tasks Model-specific optimization
Attempts Average iterations to success < 2 for standard tasks
Additional Testing Considerations
Model-specific behaviors and integration requirements

Model-Specific Behaviors

  • Hallucination tendencies: Inventing APIs or functions
  • Refusal patterns: Tasks the model won't complete
  • Language preferences: Performance variance across programming languages
  • Framework expertise: Depth of knowledge in specific tech stacks

Integration Testing

  • IDE compatibility: VS Code, JetBrains, Vim plugins
  • CI/CD pipeline: Automated code review and testing
  • Version control: Git operations and PR management
  • Documentation: Inline comments and external docs generation

Real-world Scenarios

  • Pair programming simulation: Back-and-forth debugging sessions
  • Code review effectiveness: Catching subtle bugs and security issues
  • Refactoring capabilities: Improving code without changing functionality
  • Migration assistance: Framework and language transitions
Quick Assessment Scorecard
Template for rapid model evaluation

Model: [Name/Version] | Date: [Test Date]

Core Metrics:
Speed ★★★★☆
Accuracy ★★★★☆
Steerability ★★★★☆
Context Handling ★★★★☆
Cost Efficiency ★★★★☆
Best For:
  •  Rapid prototyping
  •  Production debugging
  •  Code review
  •  Architecture design
  •  Long-running tasks
Limitations:
  • [To be filled based on testing]
Recommendation: [Daily driver / Specific use cases / Not recommended]
Continuous Evaluation Protocol
Ongoing monitoring and assessment strategy
  1. Weekly spot checks: Run standardized query set
  2. Monthly deep dives: Complete use case evaluation
  3. Regression tracking: Monitor performance degradation
  4. Feature updates: Test new capabilities as released
  5. Community feedback: Aggregate user experiences

The Ultimate Test: The Reach Test

  • Effective testing balances raw performance metrics with practical usability factors
  • The "Reach Test" remains the ultimate measure of success: do developers naturally turn to this tool?
  • Regular, structured testing using this framework helps teams make informed decisions about model adoption
Next Steps
Implementation checklist for your testing workflow
  1. Customize example queries to your specific tech stack
  2. Establish baseline metrics with current tools
  3. Create automated testing pipelines for consistent evaluation
  4. Document model-specific quirks and workarounds
  5. Share findings with your team for collaborative assessment